pretrained model Search Results


90
Abaqus Inc pretrained ann model
Pretrained Ann Model, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained ann model/product/Abaqus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained ann model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Kaggle Inc pre-trained kaggle dataset
Pre Trained Kaggle Dataset, supplied by Kaggle Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pre-trained kaggle dataset/product/Kaggle Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pre-trained kaggle dataset - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SSCOR Inc pretrained models of
Pretrained Models Of, supplied by SSCOR Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained models of/product/SSCOR Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained models of - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Pacific Biosciences pretrained kmer model
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Pretrained Kmer Model, supplied by Pacific Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained kmer model/product/Pacific Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained kmer model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Baidu Inc pretrained language model ernie
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Pretrained Language Model Ernie, supplied by Baidu Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained language model ernie/product/Baidu Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained language model ernie - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Pacific Biosciences kmer model pretrained on the sequel data
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Kmer Model Pretrained On The Sequel Data, supplied by Pacific Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/kmer model pretrained on the sequel data/product/Pacific Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kmer model pretrained on the sequel data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Matlantis pretrained model pfp
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Pretrained Model Pfp, supplied by Matlantis, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained model pfp/product/Matlantis
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained model pfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Galactica Pharma pretrained models galactica
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Pretrained Models Galactica, supplied by Galactica Pharma, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained models galactica/product/Galactica Pharma
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained models galactica - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dongguan City Kexiang Test multimodal pretraining model
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Multimodal Pretraining Model, supplied by Dongguan City Kexiang Test, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multimodal pretraining model/product/Dongguan City Kexiang Test
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multimodal pretraining model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Nference Inc biomedical pretrained language models
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Biomedical Pretrained Language Models, supplied by Nference Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biomedical pretrained language models/product/Nference Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biomedical pretrained language models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FaceX LLC model pretrained on facial recognition from the facex-zoo suite
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Model Pretrained On Facial Recognition From The Facex Zoo Suite, supplied by FaceX LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/model pretrained on facial recognition from the facex-zoo suite/product/FaceX LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
model pretrained on facial recognition from the facex-zoo suite - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATM Qness GmbH pretrained cnn model
A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel <t>kmer</t> model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.
Pretrained Cnn Model, supplied by ATM Qness GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pretrained cnn model/product/ATM Qness GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pretrained cnn model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel kmer model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Revealing long-range heterogeneous organization of nucleoproteins with N 6 -methyladenine footprinting

doi: 10.1101/2024.12.05.627052

Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Schematic for SMRT CCS and 6mA calling. B. Comparing ipdSummary and ipdTrimming pipelines for 6mA calling using the subread level Sequel data. C. Performance of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming on four different datasets as indicated on left. The thresholds for calling 6mA are indicated by black lines. For dam + plasmid DNA dataset, the thresholds for 98.5% 6mA recall are indicated by red lines. The same recall thresholds are used to calculate the background noise level for 6mA calling in the WGA dataset. False positive rates (FPR, grey shade) and false negative rates (FNR, red shade) for both Tetrahymena gDNA and human 6mA-FP samples were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. D. Comparing the computational costs, including job all clock time, CPU running time and peak memory usage of ipdSummary and ipdTrimming. E. Comparing 6mA calling results by ipdTrimming and fibertools. Red curves represent IPDr distribution for all adenine sites calculated by ipdTrimming; blue curves represent the number of adenine sites with indicated IPDr values that are called as 6mA by fibertools. The thresholds for 6mA calling by ipdTrimming are indicated by black lines. Recall rates (black label) and FPR (red label) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution. F. Comparing 6mA calling results for the Revio system, generated by the Sequel kmer model, human native gDNA control, and the Revio kmer model. FPR (grey shade) and FNR (red shade) were calculated after Gaussian demixing of IPDr distribution.

Article Snippet: The CCS IPD value was subsequently compared to a reference IPD value of its unmodified counterpart embedded in the same local sequence; all reference IPD values were generated by a pretrained kmer model ( https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/kineticsTools/tree/master/kineticsTools/resources ).

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Generated, Control